Only search Bayoubuzz
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter
Privacy assured
For Email Marketing you can trust


Article Written on: Tuesday-January-19-2010 BuzzBoards Calendar Contact Advertise About
Front Page Politics State National Business Technology Sports Entertainment



Poll: Louisiana David Vitter Has 18 Point Lead In US Senate Race


Written by: BayouBuzz Staff


Buzz Right Back----E-Mail a Friend----Print Page


Based upon a new poll, from Rasmussen, Congressman Charlie Melancon better get on track against incumbent David Vitter.  Rasmussen, today claims that  Vitter owns a striking lead in the US Senate race--now a 18 point differential.

Here is the comments from the Rasmussen poll, released today:  

Incumbent Republican David Vitter now holds an 18-point lead over his likeliest Democratic opponent, Congressman Charlie Melancon, in Louisiana's race for the U.S. Senate, suggesting for now at least that concerns about the national Democratic agenda are outweighing those about Vitter's 2007 link to a prostitution ring.

A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of likely voters in Louisiana finds Vitter leading Melancon 53% to 35%. Four percent (4%) prefer some other candidate, and eight percent (8%) are undecided.

For Vitter, the good news is that he's now capturing over 50% of the vote. In October, he led Malencon 46% to 36%, and incumbents posting less than 50% are generally viewed as vulnerable.

Secretary of State Jay Dardenne, who has reportedly been considering a GOP Primary challenge of Vitter, also leads Melancon by 18 - 53% to 31%. Dardenne held a 13-point lead over the Democrat - 46% to 33% - in October. In that match-up, six percent (6%) currently like some other candidate, and 10% are undecided.

(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.

Vitter’s name appeared on the client list of a Washington, D.C. prostitution ring in 2007, and the senator subsequently admitted to committing a “very serious sin.” Some have suggested this incident could make him more vulnerable to a primary challenge, but at this point that appears less likely.

Vitter appears to be benefiting in part from unhappiness among Louisiana voters with the national health care plan now being pushed by President Obama and congressional Democrats. Only 34% of voters in the state favor the plan, while 64% oppose it. That's stronger opposition that is found nationally.

More importantly for Vitter, 24% strongly favor the health care plan, but 58% strongly oppose it. Against Melancon, the GOP incumbent takes 80% of the vote of that larger group that strongly opposes the plan, while the Democrats captures 81% of those who strongly favor it. Dardenne gets 76% of those who are strongly opposed, compared to Melancon's 69% of those who strongly favor.

Also working to Vitter's advantage is the finding that just eight percent (8%) in Louisiana rate the U.S. economy as good or excellent, while 50% think it's in poor condition. Only 26% say the economy is getting better, but 45% believe it's getting worse and 22% say it's staying about the same.

Sixty-one percent (61%) of Louisiana voters now have a favorable opinion of Vitter, while just 33% view him unfavorably. Among Republicans, the incumbent is viewed favorably by 86%.

Forty-nine percent (49%) of Louisiana voters view Dardenne favorably, but 24% regard him unfavorably. Sixty-eight percent (68%) of GOP voters have a favorable opinion of Dardenne.

Melancon, a congressman since 2004, is viewed favorably by 39% and unfavorably by 46%.

Just 30% in Louisiana rate the federal government’s response to the Christmas Day bombing attempt on a U.S. airliner as good or excellent, while 41% rate the response as poor. Those numbers are similar to those found on the national level.

Three-out-of-four Louisiana voters (74%) believe the bombing attempt should be investigated by military authorities as a terrorist act, rather than by civilian authorities as a criminal act.

Along with voters nationwide, most voters in Louisiana (72%) believe another terrorist attack is likely within the year, and the plurality (44%) says the United States is not safer today than it was before the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

Most voters in the state (78%) also favor the use of full-body scanners at airports.

New data also has been released on Senate races in Arkansas, Colorado, Illinois, Connecticut, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Texas, Florida, and California and the special election in Massachusetts.

Rasmussen Reports has released data on the 2010 governor’s races in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina and Texas.

In 2008, Rasmussen Reports projected nationally that Obama would defeat John McCain by a 52% to 46% margin. Obama won 53% to 46%. Four years earlier, Rasmussen Reports projected the vote totals for both George W. Bush and John Kerry within half-a-percentage-point.

In Louisiana, Rasmussen Reports polled on two races during the 2008 campaign. In the race for president, Rasmussen polling showed McCain beating Obama by a 57% to 41% margin. The final election results found McCain beating Obama 59% to 40%. In the 2008 Senate race in Lousiana, Mary Landrieu defeated John Kennedy 52% to 46%. The final Rasmussen Reports poll before the election showed Landrieu winning 53% to 43%.

See all Rasmussen Reports 2008 state results for president, Senate and governor.

Please sign up for the Rasmussen Reports daily e-mail update (it’s free) or follow us on Twitter or Facebook. Let us keep you up to date with the latest public opinion news.

See survey questions and toplines. Crosstabs are available to Premium Members only.




 












 

_____________________________________________
_________________Advertisement________________

______________________________________________



 


Bookmark  and or share this article with:
Delicious reddit Digg Facebook StumbleUpon



Comments from BayouBuzz readers

No retirement benefits, no special healthcare benefits, provide each senator with a budget that he has to pay his/her salary & staff salaries, travel expenses, office expenses, etc. and then we would not need term limits. Then we might have some politicians that must face real world problems like the rest of us. Personally, there is no choice between Vitter and Melancon. Melancon is a political hack and a lap dog. Vitter is the better choice. Oh and I have sent a fax to Vitter's Lafayette office to find out the reasons why Vitter voted no on the SB 1315 issue. It's interesting that this is the only issue that Melancon supporters can come up with to debate. What about Melancon's votes on card check, stimulus, and anything that his democratic leadership needed his vote on?
Written by CN on 1/25/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I'm against "professional politicians" ... period. Let those who serve in public office do so on a temporary basis, with no retirement benefits. Term limits (one term) should also be enacted. As far as whether or not anyone on these boards "told a lie" ... who cares? The issues and policies that congress enacts are important to me, not public opinion. All too often what the public wants is for their fellow citizens to be robbed by congress for their benefit. This comes in many guises - unneeded public jobs, subsidies, contracts, bailouts, money spent in a congressional district simply because the congressman can get this appropriation passed, etc. We are not taking care of the citizens' needs due to greed. The greed I see is between congress and their "special interests." Sometimes I wish the country would have a real financial crises, then we would be forced to fund those things that are actually necessary as we could no longer afford to be as irresponsible with our tax dollars as we currently are.
Written by kpf on 1/24/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I'm not in favor of Vitter (or anyone else) holding his seat for life. But if the alternative is Charlie Boy Melancon and his good ol' boy democrat cronies and paid off minority voters, then I'll support Vitter wholeheartedly.
Written by   on 1/24/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Hey facts show that Vitter voted for the filipino benefits and against our veterans. Simply "IT IS WHAT IT IS"!!!! Landrieu voted for the Health bill! Why can't we agree that both must go? Lets hear it from CN, kpf, Jake & others posting- VOTE BOTH OUT.
Written by Lee on 1/24/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


It seems like kpf is saying that CN and company told us a very big lie. And kpf, do you buy the suggestion that Vitter and the repubs used a crystal ball before voting? The suggestion that Louisiana voters throw both senators to the retirement curb sounds good to me.
Written by Jake on 1/24/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Read it yourself. The GOP voted for this, the Dems against. Vitter voted for it, Landrieu against. That doesn't BTW change the fact that IF this is such a WONDERFUL bill, why then did those who voted for it not follow through to make it law? Again, would these same "upstanding representatives of the people" (pardon me while I gag) have neglicted to follow through on ANY piece of legislation that affected their own pay or benefits????? "Google" govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s2008-111
Written by kpf on 1/23/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Hey CN, you and another poster brought up the filipino benefit in the veterans bill. It was senate amendment 4572. I think you should read the amendment and see who wrote it, who voted for it and who voted against it. May it would help this site if you gave us a report. Suggestion, hold on to your sanity.
Written by Jake on 1/23/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Unfortunately for America, both houses of congress, therefore the committee leadership that was in control of the reconciliation process, "enjoyed" a democratic majority during the time of the handling of S 1315. Therefore, if Vitter is to be demonized for voting against it, and it was otherwise unanimous in the senate and passed with a comfortable majority in the house, then it would appear to me that democrat leadership dropped the ball by failing to successfully reconcile the house and senate versions. ----- So you democrats who laud this bill as model legislation, and want to crucify Vitter for his ineffectual vote against the bill, should be writing letters to your veteran-disrespecting leadership for their failure to successfully reconcile and shepherd this bill through congress. If this bill is that important to bring up in every discussion of Vitter, then there are many more democrats with much more responsibility for its failure than a single republican who cast a legislatively meaningless vote of dissent.
Written by   on 1/23/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


The moonbat called me a wingnut. My tender feelings are hurt. Alas, I have not had a chance to call Vitters office to ask about the s1315 bill, but I will next week.
Written by CN on 1/23/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I think kpf is finally getting it. My suggestion is to retire both of our senators and start fresh. Check the situatio we're in. One senator sits on the most powerful political comittee in the world, Appropriations, and is not bashful about bringing home the bacon. The problem is it's somewhat harmful to our big checkbook. The other senator has personal problems and is, in most cases, void of any standing. Few listen to him. We need a fresh start.
Written by Jake on 1/23/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


"how much worse for those who" - I meant to say.
Written by maybe I do need some meds? on 1/23/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I cannot find out the "particulars" (the details on all 16 amendments to this bill) but I do know that it only takes ONE "poison" amendment to make a bill unacceptable. The phrase "the Devil is in the details" most certainly applies to the crap that is crafted by our "public servants" serving at our behest in D.C. Vitter is but one person. Issues and policy is far more important than any one person. Besides, if he should be critised for failing to see this as "needed" - then how much WORSE or those those saw a "need" for disabled veterans but failed to follow through? You can be sure they don't fail to follow though on any matters that affect their OWN pay or benefits. Let's face it. The vast majority of our elected officials suck, big time. That's why we the people need to vote directly on issues instead of letting politicians decide such matters. Also, the pay and benefits of those elected officials should be far far less than what it is now. My advice is: before they take away our guns, let's take the country back from these elitist pigs.
Written by kpf, oh my, I'd better take my meds on 1/23/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Hey kpf, I just figured it out. Vitter used Wendy #2's crystal ball which told them that the bill would not become law and he said "no big deal". Perhaps he still has access and that is why he votes no so often. I would bet that Wendy #1 would like to find that crystal ball.
Written by Joyce on 1/23/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


According to "govtrack" it never became law. If congress actually wanted it to become law, it would have. Although Vitter is accused often of grandstanding, what does one call it when a bill such as this passes both houses of congress but never becomes law? Did they - in their great "concern" for our disabled veterans - forget to follow through and resolve the differences in conference and vote on it up or down? It seems illogical to denigrate Vitter for voting against it when those that did (a majority in both houses of congress) failed to follow through. Sounds like a case of "much ado about nothing" to me.
Written by kpf on 1/23/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


A few more simple questions about s. 1315. Was it ever enacted into law? If so, when. If not, why not?? It appears that is passed the Senate and the House (with amendments). If there was ever a resolution between the house and senate versions, I can't find it.
Written by   on 1/23/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I agree with kpf to a point. We have to look at the candidates in the present. However, I truly have a hard time forgetting Melancon's vote for the stimulus and Vitter' lack of care for our veterans. Hopefully, no one has any pictures of the diaper episodes.
Written by Joyce on 1/23/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


More to the point on the race for Vitter's seat are the policies of the current administration, those may very well determine if he holds on to his seat in the senate, not how he voted on any particular piece of legislation.
Written by kpf on 1/23/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I think Vitter did vote for the recent GI Bill.
Written by Susan on 1/23/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


The post by Jake is quite factual. Both votes took place on April 24 of 2008. Senator Vitter voted for the filipino benefit. It was defeated by 6 republicans and the democrats. The venefits for our military passed at 12:59pm with Vitter the only no vote.
Written by Jane on 1/23/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


AND here is the truth on the Vitter Vote against our veterans. The Veterans Benefit Enhancement Bill that passed the senate 96-1 (Vitter saying no) was without the filipino benefit. That benefit was offered in Amendment 4572 by republican Richard Burr from North Carolina. And guess who voted YES for that benefit? It was none other than Vitter and 39 other republicans. Amazing that CN and the other idiot wingnut are trying to fool the readers of this site.
Written by Jake on 1/23/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Here is the explanation for Vitter's vote in the bill you referred to: "S. 1315, the Veterans’ Benefits Enhancement Act of 2007, contained a controversial provision that provides a new, special pension to Filipino veterans from World War II who live in the Philippines, who have no service-related injuries, and who already receive a pension from the Philippine government. The bill would provide a $221 million pension benefit to World War II Filipino veterans who have no war-related injuries and who reside in the Philippines. As American troops are returning home from combat everyday, this is exactly the wrong priority at the wrong time. America should concentrate more resources on caring for our veterans. Yet S.1315 put the needs of non-injured Filipino veterans above the needs of disabled U.S. veterans. It creates a generous government benefit for Filipinos that far exceeds the pension that U.S. veterans get when adjusted for cost of living. This bill would literally take pension money from U.S. veterans to create a pension program overseas. It set’s a horrible precedent that other countries will follow. Who’s next? Iraq soldiers asking for US pension money for freeing their country? Afghanistan fighters? The bottom line is we paid in blood and lives for Philippine freedom. The monies should have been re-directed towards US soldiers and not Philippine’s who were given their freedom with American blood." The $221 million benefit for Filipino forces in this bill is the kind of business as usual, political vote-buying with our tax dollar, that has Americans so riled up now. Hopefully, Vitter's vote drew attention to the "generosity" of another politician who was willing to transfer hundreds of millions of American money to foreign nationals whose country was protected by the blood and lives of Americans in WWII. Sure, the Filipino people suffered greatly in that war. But our share of that debt was paid with American lives and suffering. This Filipino benefit section of the bill is the work of a Hawaiian Senator who needed votes of Americans with Filipino heritage to maintain his political empire. Call it the Filipino Feedbag. I hope that Vitter and many more congressmen and senators have the guts and integrity to point out these millions and billions of special interest spending in the bills that sneak through congress daily.
Written by   on 1/22/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Still waiting for the details on that Vitter vote.
Written by   on 1/22/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Please post the date and details on this Vitter vote for all the wingnuts to see in black and white.
Written by   on 1/22/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Tell you what Lee, I'll spend the weekend with Vitter and the unfounded diaper allegations. You spend the weekend with Barney Frank and the admitted use of ribbed condoms for mudgrips, if you catch my drift.
Written by   on 1/21/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


We in St. Mary parish do not like Melancon. As far as Vitter's vote, are we talking about the Filipino benefits senate bill S1315 that was killed by Pelosi in the House? I tried checking out the vote and all I can find out about it are from the democratic party and they are just a little biased. So I will be calling his office tomorrow and will ask about a recent veterans bill that he voted against and ask why. Unlike some of you moonbats out there I do not believe every thing I hear. Vitter vs. Melancon = an easy choice, Vitter. I would rather have a soiled representative fight against the status quo rather than have a nitwit(but a nice nitwit) who you can count on to vote the way his "leadership" wants him to. But even the moonbats should agree that it's a shame that this is what we have to choose from for our elected public servant. But, if Mrs. Vitter can forgive the cad, I guess I will too.
Written by CN on 1/21/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


The goofball who responded about Vitter's negative vote on the veterans bill is an example of the wingnuts who haven't a clue about whats really going on. There were 98 senators voting. It passed 97-1 with your boy saying no to the veterans. This was a super bipartisan bill and George Bush welcomed it. Now I guess the other 98 senators are just bleeding liberals, along with Bush. Maybe you're in the designer diaper business and don't want to lose your best customer.
Written by Lee on 1/21/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Ahhh, could all that include passive or aggressive 'obstructionism' on the part of our Lordy-Lordy Congressional Representatives as well there WBII?
Written by   on 1/21/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Vitter's vote was a result of the kind of democratic party lawmaking that created the Louisiana Purchase and the Cornhusker Kickback. The kind of lawmaking that set ol' Teddy spinning in his cursed grave. When democrats attach good things to bad bills, responsible legislators should kill the bill, especially when the bad outweighs the good exponentially. That's the case with the veterans legislation and unless you're ignorant, you already know that. --- Intelligent voters know that a good senator will not be cornered into voting for a pile of krap just to get an extra sheet of toilet paper. The paper won't come close to cleaning up the mess in the rest of the legislation.
Written by   on 1/21/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Glad to see you back on the board there Tony G. When are you running again, or are you going to?
Written by   on 1/21/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Vitter voted against the benefits bill because of it's cost. He deeply values his coservative rating. How easy it seems for some to forget the returning soldier,airman, sailor or marine, particularly for those who never served a single day. And they are the first to wrap themselves in the flag.
Written by   on 1/21/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


CN, I repeat that we in Lafourche are quite satisfied with Charlie. I have grave doubts of your ability to understand what you read. It's apparent in your posting. Perhaps you can enlighten me on one recent subject you professed a lot of knowledge on, veterans benefits. You were supposed to find out why your diaper boy was the only negative vote for the veterans benefit bill. I'm sure that you will have to vote for your " Diaper Boy" regardless of his allegiance to the porn trade.
Written by Jane on 1/21/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Tony, do you have a truck? Cause I don't think riding the city bus will resonate quite the same way with voters.
Written by   on 1/21/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Gentile is the candidate to beat, it's his race to lose. The others are same old same old. Louisianan's want something new.
Written by Tony G on 1/20/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Exactly right, CN. If Melancon's vote was needed by this democratic party bosses, he'd have proudly delivered it. His vote in this case is a crystal clear example of the kind of deceit, arrogance, and corruption that the democratic party is built upon. And anyone who actually believes that Melancon puts them first is an ignorant dupe.
Written by   on 1/20/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Those of us over here in St. Mary are happy that we are getting rid of Melancon. He is a decent guy and has a wonderful family, but he is a pawn of the democratic leadership. He has stated that he voted for the stimulus bill with out reading it, he stated that he signed onto the card check legislation as a co-sponsor with out reading the bill. He only voted against the healthcare bill because they did not need his vote and he was running for the Senate. He is not representing the voters, he represents those who help get him elected. He has even stated this in a public venue. He needs to go back to Napoleanville and spend quality time with Peachy.
Written by CN on 1/20/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Observation: The Louisiana delegation, with the exception of Cao, votes against the House health bill. How does Melancon get faulted while the others are applauded? It seems apparent that so many on these forums don't have a clue who voted how or what was in the legislation. While we here in Lafourche haven't always agreed with Melancon, he has done a good job overall. For many reasons we wish him a great future whether in politics or not. We have the luxury of knowing he is a real family man. Those supporting his rival have the unfortunate worry about the whores and designer diapers.
Written by Jane on 1/20/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I guess he sort of fell out of vogue.......
Written by   on 1/20/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


No statement from Carville yet?
Written by jackamo on 1/20/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Jackamo, you forgot to add Saints commercials in your list of values or desires... Geaux Saints Geaux!!!!!
Written by   on 1/20/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Apparently, they can't buy votes in Massachusetts with a hotdog and a coke like they can do here.
Written by jackamo on 1/20/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


The facts are there need to be more folks from an independant party running, Repubs and Democrits are simply bad for business as a majority, or as a 50/50 split. We perhaps need to be putting politics into a more Detante' style of approach. You folks just don't get it, and take great pleasure in watching some figure head getting crapped on instead of fixing the problems we are faced with. What a bunch of imbeciles.
Written by   on 1/20/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Happy Obama Coronation anniversary, you democrat losers. What a difference a years makes.
Written by   on 1/20/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Quiddo, any insight from another experienced azz-kicked democrat on the meaning of the Brown victory?
Written by   on 1/20/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Would someone please drag the pond at Chappaquiddick? KJ may be down there holding her breath. If not there, then maybe in that borrow pit by Carville's hidey-hole.
Written by   on 1/20/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


And driving duties for Edwards have always included bag-man responsibilities along with whore-screening.
Written by   on 1/20/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Melancon was Edwards driver back in the day, where do you think he got his training?
Written by CN on 1/20/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


He can't run away from Obama and Landrieu. The choice is clear. Does Louisiana want to side with Reid, Pelosi, Landrieu, Obama? Or take the Scott Brown road? I think I know the answer, even if the dimocrats don't.
Written by   on 1/20/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Melancon is a political hack who gained his notoriety and power through the corrupt democratic machine in Louisiana, led by mentors like Bob Odom and Edwin Edwards. He stands for nothing except himself, and is tied to the corrupt, vote-buying party that was his path to fame and fortune. He deserves to go down with the democratic ship.
Written by   on 1/20/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Melancon is basically a good man who has tied himself to the wrong party, and accepts toeing the party line. He is not voting as his constituents wanted on ObamaCare: if he had, he might have had a chance in the upcoming election. But he is too much in bed with Reid and Pelosi. There is no welcome in today's Democratic party for conservatives or moderates. John Breaux wisely bailed out, but has unwisely endorsed Congressman Cao's opponent. If he really cared about Louisiana, rather than his lobbying business, he would support Cao.
Written by chaubert on 1/19/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Well said, CN. Melancon makes Coakley look like a winner. The walls of Camelot have finally crumbled.
Written by   on 1/19/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


So Mr. Melancon, wish you had gone to more town hall meetings? Wish you had listened to your constituents? It's going to be ugly in November unless Vitter really screws up, but I don't think he will. His wife has his manhood nailed to front door and is using it for a door knocker. Melancon will be crushed, he is a bad candidate and a lap dog for his democratic leadership.
Written by CN on 1/19/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Where are the teabagger and Quidd and KJ to celebrate democracy in action in Massachusetts? Where is James Carville? HItch you wagons to Obama, you losers!!!!!!!!
Written by   on 1/19/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Amazing that with 3 conservatives in the race, Louisiana supports the whoremonger.
Written by Daniel Z on 1/19/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


They left out the Libertarian candidate again, I believe they're scared what they will find out. People are seriously starting to look at a third party.
Written by Tony G on 1/19/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE






Related Articles

Louisiana Legislature: Perry Faces Moreno in New Orleans Brutal Special Election

Louisiana Open Primary Law Would Make Cao Re-Election Uncertain

Louisiana Sen. Vitter Gives GOP Response, Dem. Opponent Melancon Criticizes

Should Questions Be Raised About Louisiana Jindal Book Deal Considering BP Oil Spill?

Louisiana Sen. Landrieu Proposes New Oil Revenue Share Legislation

Also by this Author


Louisiana Governor Jindal Will Focus On BP Oil. Spill, Not Book

New Orleans Port Says Tanker Hit BP Spill Oil, Needed Cleaning

BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill: Louisiana Governor Jindal Urges Cooperation

BP Suttles: Top Kill Planned For Wednesday To Stop Gulf Oil Discharge

Louisiana Legislature: Perry Faces Moreno in New Orleans Brutal Special Election





Sitemap
Advertise Buzzback Calendar About
Business Politics State National Sci/Tech Entertainment Sports World
© 2006-2007 BAYOUBUZZ.COM ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



006 BAYOUBUZZ.COM ALL RIGHTS RESERVED