To bail out or not to bail out? That is the question being debated in Washington this week as the Big Three Auto Makers plead for a $25 billion bailout. Members of the Louisiana congressional delegation are either strongly opposed to any federal money going to Detroit, or at best are ambivalent as to the problem. The thinking is it really doesn't make that much difference here Louisiana. But does it?
On my radio show broadcast from New Orleans last week, I raised the issue of whether there was justification for taxpayer dollars being injected into the domestic auto industry. The response was overwhelmingly "no way." Most Louisianians don't really care what happens to these American car makers, recognizing that there are many foreign options available. So how much impact will shutting down the big three auto producers really have on Louisiana?It's a lot more significant than most people realize.
General Motors has a large production plant in Shreveport producing three different vehicles; Hummers, Colorados, and Canyons.1500 workers produce these vehicles, and plant officials were hoping this number would increase to 3000 by the middle of next year. But that's only one aspect of the auto financial impact throughout the state. Shreveport, Baton Rouge and New Orleans all have become relay stations where American cars are stockpiled as they are transported to other parts of United States. Estimates are that as many as 1000 jobs are involved in the state relay operation alone.
Several large trucking companies are involved in moving GM products from Shreveport to dealerships located throughout the United States.Rail networks operating throughout Louisiana also are actively involved in auto transportation. Sen. Bennett Johnston was successful some years back in garnering federal money for a rail spur allowing train traffic to come into the Shreveport GM plant. A number of good paying jobs are involved in the effort of moving vehicles once they come off the assembly line.
There are a variety of other subsidiary manufacturing plants in northwest Louisiana servicing GM. Several stamped metal body companies in Louisiana produce the frames for GM cars and deliver them to the production site in Shreveport. GM officials estimate that besides the 1500 employees operating at their Shreveport site, the ancillary production operations and transportation impact creates an additional 1500 jobs.
And how about the various domestic auto dealerships spread throughout Louisiana?Of a total of 345 dealerships, 221 sell American made cars.That’s 65% of all dealers in the state. And each of these dealers hires, on average, 54 workers totaling approximately 12,000 employees throughout Louisiana. Right now, these dealership owners and employees are deeply concerned.
I attended a dinner party this week that included three different Louisiana auto dealers all selling American made vehicles. In individual conversations, I made small talk by asking how their day was going. They each indicated that they spent the day watching C-SPAN to view the hearings on the proposed Big Three Bailout taking place in Washington.
What about bankruptcy? A number of companies in industries like airlines, steel and retailing have shown that, by taking bankruptcy, they can restructure and offer a fresh start to preserve a future for their workers. It would seem like a reasonable alternative for companies like G. M. to submit a prepackaged bankruptcy plan, laying out steps they will enact once it receives Chapter 11 protection. This would buy some time for an orderly shakeout.
But again, there’s a danger for Louisiana auto dealerships and their employees if bankruptcy becomes the alternative. Car dealerships selling American automobiles are independently owned, and have contractual relationships with the Big Three to sell their cars. If the producers go bankrupt, then the contract with the dealer is abrogated and is no longer in effect. Producers like GM will then be at liberty to pick and choose what dealers sell their cars, and what contracts they want to void under the bankruptcy protection. That means a number of Louisiana car dealers could be out of business.
Another big problem with bankruptcy is that car buyers could well see it as a sign that the cars they bought may not retain their value. Who wants to buy a car from a company that is in deep trouble and may completely go under?A recent poll involving over 6000 consumers found that some 80% of them would not purchase a car from a company that files bankruptcy. If someone purchases a ticket on a bankrupt airline, it is a one-shot transaction that is over quickly. A car on the other hand is a major investment where families want the assurance that it will perform for a period of time. Maybe three or four years, because that's all part of the bargain.
But the biggest danger for any company considering bankruptcy is finding liquidity. Where can you locate a lender? With the severe downturn the country is facing today, and banks themselves in line for bailouts, who's going to loan any money to GM and other auto producers if they are trying to reorganize under court protection?
The good news in all this is that at least there is a recognition of the problem here Louisiana. The state has a lot at stake, and the automobile industry could be a significant factor in achieving any long-term economic growth. The Department of Economic Development has hired the A. T. Kearney research consulting firm that specializes in automotive issues to determine what kind of economic future the state has in the area of automotive production. So far, three goals have been set.
The first is to maintain and continue to expand the GM plant operating Shreveport. Second is to try to find a company, either domestic or foreign, to build on what Development Secretary Stephen Moret says is hands-down the best available physical automobile site in the country. The State of Louisiana owns some 2000 acres in northeast Louisiana right off of Highway I-20 in Richland Parish.The site is being actively shopped as a new plant location to automobile manufacturers worldwide.
Moret also points out that with the enlargement of the Panama Canal, South Louisiana should be in the mix as an auto production location. "With our rail and port facilities throughout South Louisiana, our state is a natural to build cars in Louisiana and export them throughout South America. I think this has great potential for Louisiana in the years to come."
So we are talking in Louisiana about short-term problems and long-range opportunities. The question then is, despite a lot of local voter opposition, should elected representatives of Louisiana in Washington support a major auto financial bailout? There is the potential of some 20,000 jobs being directly affected and many that could go by the wayside.
And when you consider the fact that one insurance company that has a major presence in Louisiana, AIG, will receive well over $125 billion from taxpayers, a $25 billion infusion nationally to protect 20,000 jobs in Louisiana alone seems almost like chump change.
Jim Brown’s weekly column appears in a number of newspapers and websites throughout the State of Louisiana.You can read Jim’s Blog, and take his weekly poll, plus read his columns going back to the fall of 2002 by going to his own website at http://www.jimbrownla.com.
Jim also has a new book out on his views of Louisiana.You can read about it and order it by going to www.jimbrownla.com. .
Jim’s radio show on WRNO (995 fm) from New Orleans can be heard each Sunday, from 11:00 am until 1:00 pm.
Many good points there... the surplus was more due to a divided DC (the GOP had control of congress for ALL 6 years of "Clinton's" surplus) than Clinton being a "thrifty" guy; Bill Clinton DID NOT have a surplus when his party had control of congress. Also a good point on the "how much the CEOs make" whining. Who cares? If your son-in-law loses all his money at the casino... and after you confront him says "do you realize how much the manager makes at that casino?" - WTF does that have to do with his poor decision to gamble with money he cannot afford to lose? Same with the housing market, auto manufacturers, etc. Nobody forces you to buy a home you cannot afford.... of course....then again.... now "our" government will FORCE us to bailout all of the people who made poor choices... that's America since the Rockerfellers and their ilk have been running things. Written by kpf
on 11/26/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
The budget 'surplus' Bush supposidly had when he entered office was smoke and mirrors illusion...... Clinton had raided the social security fund and did an accounting trick that left the books looking like there was a surplus when in fact there was a budget deficit.... Right now we are laboring under another illusion... Where is the money? It's still there, it is still floating around... Who has it? The Germans have a lot of it, and the Chinese have a lot of it, and...................... and................... and.................... The facts of the matters are; As population levels increase, so to does the amount of money being printed...... Or instead of everyone having a hundred dollar bill in their pocket, they will only have a 50..... So enter GNP and GDP considerations.... Right now the media wants everyone to focus on those 'bad guy' CEO's..... and how much they make per year..... It is crumbs in comparison to the big picture..... Written by
on 11/26/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
Huey P. Newton, founder of the Black Panthers… A Monroe, Louisiana product….. andDerrick Todd Lee……. A St. Francisville, Louisiana product. John Allen ‘Muhhamad’ Williams, a New Orleans product and his ‘disciple’ John Lee Malvo, a.k.a. Malik Malvo that was imported from Kingston, Jamaica….. The current contemplated bailout of at least 1 along with the other 2 in the “Big 3”? 25 billion and expected to actually be 50 billion or higher…. Cost of New Orleans after Katrina as a result of a ‘literal bailout’? 50 billion +? Very easily……. (Who really knows what the actual numbers are, they are all so screwed up….. ) “Big 3” disappearing? It will be felt nationwide……. For decades to come….. Had New Orleans not been rebuilt? In nationwide economic terms It wouldn’t even have been noticed …. And when it came time to be noticed, bout the only affect it did have on a nationwide level was the massive media coverage and its domination of newstime on CNN.. But a lot of folks in Louisiana are saying no to the “Big 3 bailout”….. Including our prominent politicians….. What a bunch of selfish individuals….. But it is not entirely unbiased when I write that the effects of Katrina were not really noticiable outside of Louisiana……. Speaking of New Orleans, and Louisiana economic products…. After Katrina, general crime levels as well as violent crime levels in Dallas, Houston, Atlanta and various other cities and towns around the nation where our ‘products’ landed ‘spiked’ significantly…….. So I suppose we did have a viable export product…. So I would wonder, what is really at the crux of Louisiana’s ability to produce such outstanding and productive products to be enjoyed by the masses? Written by
on 11/25/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
An interesting Power Point presentation on savings, consumption and economic growth.http://www.auburn.edu/%7Egarriro/ppsus.htm ____ or this: an article on how much government has grown under "conservative" President Bush.
http://www.aier.org/research/commentaries/750-big-government-under-the-bush-administration
Written by kpf
on 11/24/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
This insurance thing is but one of the problems with our financial operational procedures….. But it is one of the big “3”…… Energy costs/petroleum based chemicals costs for production are another, and then you get into financing………. What chaps my arse with economic development protocols, or “angel investor” protocols is in effect they want 90%....... Their rationalization “Oh, to make up for the losses incurred in other business fundings that went sour”… Whaaaaaaaaatttt? So in other words, the person looking for investment capital is not only trying to make its interests become viable, it is also paying for bad investments that weren’t viable AND putting profit into those entities pockets at the same time…. And a person is supposed to be able to confidently proclaim to a prospective employee that it is making a good choice investing its time into a company AND go ahead and secure a line of credit to buy a house, a car, furniture, toasters, t.v.’s, etc.?????? Damn, the aspiring business person is shot in the ass before it even gets out the gate!!!!!! And bank interest rates? Crazy, crazy, crazy….. And then property taxes, ad valorum taxes on top of that AS WELL as insurance costs and the threat of lawsuit liability for a frivolous claim? Written by
on 11/24/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
Do you want to really know why oil is down to around 50 bucks a barrel? Simple.... The insurance industry, and the ha-ha financial savings industries are strapped for cash right now..... so much so that the government has to bail them for hundreds upon hundreds of billions of dollars..... And...... Well, they don't have spare cash floating around to invest in oil futures.... That is why the price is down... Doesn't have that much to do with folks driving less... But it has everything to do with the insurance industry and finance industry having less investment capital to manipulate the market... Sort of like the Hunt boys out of Texas when they went to corner the market on Silver a couple decades ago.... And look at the price per oz. of Ag/79 now.. Gasoline is a naturally occuring process during the refining process... It has to "cook off" while the refinery gets to the other products such as diesel, kerosene, lubricating oils and greases.... You think a gallon of gas costs? Try buying a gallon of grease and see what's what... Or try a gallon of Rotella, or a hydraulic fluid.... Written by
on 11/24/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
Redundant effects…… Insurance/judgment award reforms are of tremendous necessity….. This is one of the absolute killers of business enterprise…… Be it private, partnership, or corporate….. Just like the monthly bank note, the insurance note never sleeps…. Their business model is enforced by tax subsidized law makers, police forces, and court systems. And when that industry wants more above and beyond what it legally forces (the mafia used to call insurance ‘protection’) the consumer to pay, it goes back to the initial feed trough “the taxpayer” via our ‘constitutional’ and ‘legally’ sanctioned government to supplement it yet again…. Written by
on 11/24/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
Whatever the "reasons" for not being able to compete may be, the more efficient (quality/cost) manufacturer will get the sales. It is the American consumer who creates the need for more Wal-Marts and fewer "Mom-and-Pop" stores; this is nothing more than consumers getting the most value for the least expense. If one's overhead is high (due to labor costs or anything else) then in order to stay profitable (attractive to consumers) one must have some advantage (productivity and/or quality) to compete with the low cost producer. Unless one gets favorable tariffs, subsidies or bailouts, but that only takes money from the private sector that would otherwise be used either as savings or in expanding our economy in more competitive enterprises. Written by kpf
on 11/24/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
The foreign auto manufacturers have a couple of advantages. One, their workforces are younger which means that they haven't had as many years of accumulating merit increases in salary, which means that labor costs are lower for the Japanese, German etc. car-makers at least for that reason as well as because their workforces are non-union. Also, in those nations they have single-payer healthcare systems and thus, unlike the domestic-headquartered manufacturers, they don't have those costs to bear. Written by Moderate Independent Voice
on 11/23/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
Of course I meant GM, Ford and CHRYSLER in my earlier comment. Written by puzzled guy
on 11/21/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
Why is it that Nissan, Toyota, Acura, Mercedes, Volkswagen, Subaru etc. etc. can build automobiles in US factories and turn a profit, while GM, Ford, and Toyota are going broke? I know that states have given them huge incentives to build plants here, but American automakers have received the same benefits (such as GM in Shreveport). Old Quidder is just a typical leftist, wants working taxpayers to foot the bill for everyone else. But politicians are already planning their next campaigns, so you can be sure that Shreveport voters will be reminded that Vitter opposed the taxpayer funded bailout. One more reason why America is in decline. But those Democrats will keep pandering until they go down with the ship. Only problem is its our ship, and we're going down with it too. Written by puzzled guy
on 11/21/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
Socialists and Protectionists do not understand why one should NEVER throw good money after bad - they really do not have a clue - so they will only mess things up worse than they already are. Good, we need to hit the brick wall, which will hopefully allow us to refocus on what actually works economically (it's not to be found in "Das Kapital"). Or maybe we'll all become government dependant serfs, perhaps that's what we deserve, perhaps that's what we want. Written by kpf
on 11/21/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
“Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none.” – Thomas Jefferson “Hummers? I don’t know about that as being a basis for a complaint, or even a practical observation….. And in as far as Chauberts’ muse; “No. Educate our people and reform our government so we can attract the new car companies: Honda, Toyota, Nissan, BMW, Mercedes, etc. Almost every Southern state has a foreign car manufacturing operation - except Louisiana.” It is errant in assumption, ascertainment, and an assault on basic principles that are the driving force of American prosperity…… I have been to the Mercedes Benz plant in Alabama, and another German offshoot exists in South Carolina, the Bavarian Motor Works… There is also the Nissan plant in Mississippi….. But I also remember posting “Or the big 3 gets back to square one on 1/4 of their current product line, with rapid development of useful products that represent value/worth/and need coupled with lower costs on the American market place...” So Hummers? I seem to remember that the Shreveport plant was initially engaged in assembling the Chevy S-10 pickup back in the 80’s? Of course that had a 22 year production run… And now? That product line is replaced with Colorado’s and Silverado’s…….. And yes, large ½ ton and ¾ ton trucks are a necessity for some people…. Try hauling a bail of hay in a PT cruiser…. And as far as “Hummers” go, well, I would like one although my preference sort of tends to favor military surplus style Hummers, and when it comes to trucks for similar purposes (Off road, up in the mountains, out in the deserts, etc., etc. where I could care less about paint jobs, dents, dings, air conditioning, you know, just a rugged ass vehicle that will take me to hell and back without any love lost) I prefer late 40’s late 50’s military surplus Dodge Power Wagons in the ¾ ton range with a huge winch to get me out of a bind when I fall off the goat trail… I posted earlier “The bail out of the big 3? Very dicey unless consumers attitudes and the economy changes or improves...... Or the big 3 gets back to square one on 1/4 of their current product line, with rapid development of useful products that represent value/worth/and need coupled with lower costs on the American market place... What their foreign commitments are I have no idea”… And there you have it….. Chrysler? Try Daimler-Chrysler….. Dodge? Loaded with Mitsubishi AND Bosch derivatives…. Dodge-Chrysler-Plymouth (Mopar)?...... It gets even more convoluted…. GM? Up to its gills in Nissan, Isuzu, Suzuki, Subaru and SAAB, Ford? Well they are into Renault, Mazda, some U.K. based auto concerns (Monster FLA ‘Shelby Cobra’ had its roots in F.L.A.) as well as many, many, many others….. So when Chaubert say’s; “reform our government so we can attract the new car companies: Honda, Toyota, Nissan, ………………………” I have to say; I smell a rat……… “Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.” – Ronald Reagan (1986)…….. The auto industry debacle we are now facing has its roots in the 50’s…. It started with Nissan and the granting of most favored trading nation status… With Japan….. (The military industrial complex of Japan was comprised of folks such as Honda, Mitsubishi, Kawasaki, Suzuki etc……. You know, like Mitsubishi Zero’s that attacked Pearl Harbor. Or how about the Mitsubishi ship yards at Nagasaki that produced Japanese battle ships? Or Kawasaki’s fighter craft? ) And they entered the U.S. market with cheap, fuel efficient miniature pickup trucks……. Then came Honda motorcycles, followed by Honda cars….. And Japan has more automobile manufacturers’ than the United States (Remember the LaSalle, Hudson, Packard, Nash, Studebaker, DeSoto, the Franklin, and go even farther back and you have Stanley, and Stutz, etc…….. One probably doesn’t realize it, but Ford Motor Company produced the B-24 Liberator during WW II, as well as Sherman tanks…. In fact FMC currently produces more than just a few of the platforms we utilize in our current armored support classifications for military use…. And GM produced famed fighter aircraft such as the Wildcat, and the Thunderbolt “the Flying Jug, one of my favorites although ugly as sin it was one hell of a tough attack/fighter aircraft bested only by the Mustang and the Spitfire” ) In effect, this multi billion dollar bailout appears to be a way to prop up foreign interests more so than U.S. interests….. And folks such as Chaubert seem to be advocating, under government oversight and sanctioned policy the final and complete dismantling of American based manufacturing concerns so that folks can drive “New car companies” that are nothing more than wolves in sheep clothing…… Now I take heart when Eisenhower said to take heed to the military industrial complex shortly before leaving office, but a nation with no means of defense, is a nation that does not serve its people…….. Government policy…… Take Louisiana for instance…… The Shaw group… Interesting little ‘group’ of people…….. Nuclear power plants for Westinghouse?....... And additional seed money to keep their pursuits afloat? How about massive amounts of Government contracts via the United States Army Corp of Engineers, and sanctioned by share holders or stock holders that also have prominence in Louisiana State Government administrative effects? Same thing…… Some select ‘group’ via taxpayer dollars are dictating out what or what not it is that the American public, or the American tax dollars are going to be dedicated towards…… Free market? It does not exist…. Do you think something like Strongconcrete has a chance when faced with government policy, and corporate direction is against it…. Remember, it is corporations that elect our leaders, not the common man…… I am not saying for the United States to toss Honda, Nissan, etc., etc., etc. out the door much like the Chinese did Buick, or more pointedly GM shortly after WW II, but what I am saying is that corporate policies, when funded by U.S. taxpayer dollars should be open and transparent… Not steeped in hypocrisy much in the same fashion as Jindal’s supposed ‘ethics reforms’ that are merely candy in a jar that sits in the dime store’s window…. We do need to provide a fashion for the Big 3 to help itself serve American interests…. It is fool hardy to rely upon foreign entities in their entirety to provide U.S. products, and U.S. jobs….. We are not a corporation, we are a democracy…….. And there should be the opportunity for every American citizen to excel if it truly has something that is worth excelling towards………. And under current conditions, current leadership, current policies, and current enforcement practices this is an impossible position to achieve…. Mind you I did not say maintain because we are maintaining nothing, we are scarcely even capable of keeping our heads above water any more… Written by
on 11/21/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
David Vitter opposes the bailout, so he obviously doesn't understand the adverse impact of GM going bust on Louisiana. We need a new US Senator in 2010. Written by David Quidd
on 11/21/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
Subsidize a company that makes Hummers? No.
Educate our people and reform our government so we can attract the new car companies: Honda, Toyota, Nissan, BMW, Mercedes, etc. Almost every Southern state has a foreign car manufacturing operation - except Louisiana. Why is that?
There are no short term fixes for Louisiana. There is only a hope in a better educated, more competent and honest state and local government, and a drastic reform of the educational system. Otherwise, Baton Rouge, Shreveport, Monroe, Alexandria, etc. are headed in the same direction as New Orleans - and for all the same reasons. It will take decades. But we have to start now, and hoping for the magic fix will not work. Written by chaubert
on 11/20/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
how will it change? Excellent observation and excellent post..... My thoughts where the economic development board is concerned is that they are stumbling around in a kitchen trying to come up with a new recipe for a cake....... They do not have the faintest ideas of the inter and intra complexities of the industries they are trying to hobble together in an attempt to 'change' the landscape at taxpayer expense......... Instead of dealing with resources and market outlets we have a vested advantage in, they try to take away from what is inherent in another region in an attempt to make it "there own".... The GM plant in Shreveport? History......... The bail out of the big 3? Very dicey unless consumers attitudes and the economy changes or improves...... Or the big 3 gets back to square one on 1/4 of their current product line, with rapid development of useful products that represent value/worth/and need coupled with lower costs on the American market place... What their foreign commitments are I have no idea....... But for a large part I see the dollars flying to foreign shores to prop up their manufacturing endeavors......... THIS IS NOT FREE MARKET in any form of the word or concept...... I would hope I am not being blinded by nostalgia or 'patriotism' when I express a desire for GM, Chrysler, and Ford to continue on as 'flagship' American industries, but in the corporate format as it now exists this does seem to be the case....... And the only thing that sways my support of some form of a bail out effort is largely as a result of the understanding of the necessity for the U.S. to have these type of domestic resources out of strategic defense needs... If we can't even make our own cars, what good are we to our selves... It is a sign of the times... We must get back into manufacturing... We cannot be a solely service based economy........ And we must find ways to do them less expensivly.... Governement intervention? How about the reduction in insurance costs, liabilities awards? Import taxes? I believe that on a state level, states can effect additonal taxes on foreign made commodities... Intra State charges or surcharges imposed upon one state or another as they use our roadways is against the law... But it says nothing about foreign goods, or foreign origins products... Protectionism? Yes and No........ I am not interested in becoming dependent upon a foreign nation for anything I wish to consume..... There has to be a way to demesmerize the American public from continuing on with its current unpatriotic habits...... Immigration Reform? One of the number one tickets.... Cost of living reductions? Again, a number one ticket..... The only reason why we are not a number one influence in global affairs is because we are allowing those affairs globaly to spit in our faces....... We are the United States of America, we practice democracy, and we have our constitution...... If the other nations want democracy, let them pursue there democracies, and let them formulate their constitutions...... Written by
on 11/20/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
Spoken like a true lobbyist. Exactly what will be different with the Big 3 once our $25 billion is spent and gone? Written by how will it change?
on 11/20/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
Ohh, almost forgot, it only takes 8 hours to 'train' a trainee o.j.t. for this duty... No college degree needed..... Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!!!!! Written by
on 11/20/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
Don't take it personal Jim, but you might perhaps be stuck on stoopid..... Think resources Jim... You know, things that are commonly found in abundance in a geographical proximity.... You are still trying to flog farts out of ThyssenKrupp NUCOR type scenarios, and hoping a marketing hookup can be made for a GM type Ménage à trois a' la the New Orleans 'ha-ha-ha' "Port system...... But back to resources, think plastics, think acrylics, think polymers, ehhhhh... think latex even....... Ever seen a latex glove being made? Pretty simple operation really... 5 industrial washateria style dryers..... 15 or 20 4’ X 10’ X 14” deep rectangular fiberglass troughs, and a bunch of molded mannequin hands screwed down on a template..... The troughs have liquid latex rubber in them, you dip the racks that have the hands screwed on down into the goo, bring it back up, wait a couple minutes for the hands to air dry, peel the gloves off the molds, toss them in the dryer for about 20 minutes...... I knew one guy that used to produce about 1000 pair an hour like this for Glover Latex...... And the place ran 24/7 – 52 weeks a year... Ever look at the retail price of latex dishwashing gloves? As long as people are going to wash dishes, or scrub toilets, latex gloves will always be in demand..... Speaking of scrubbing toilets, I wonder if anyone in Louisiana manufactures toilet plungers???? Ahhhhhh,,, pine handles from the piney woods of North Louisiana, or plastic if you prefer, AND a rubber product from Louisiana???? Hmmmmm.... Written by
on 11/20/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
Sen. Bennett Johnston? Is this the same Sen. Bennett Johnston that the Sen. Bennett Johnston waterway is named for? I believe it is on the Red River... Interesting little project the Corp is persuing, they want to put a series of locks or dams or something on the Red River "To restore its characteristic red color" that has dissappeared due to irrigation water being pumped out of the Red River for agricultural purposes thereby decreasing its volume and flow rate... However in the hell it is supposed to work, ehhhhh,, who knows? And as far as Shreveport as a major auto manufacture (assembly) location? Support logistics dictate that as an absurd daydream....... I at least understand that much of the auto industry..... It's all in biovouac Jim, staging and biovouac resources... Written by
on 11/20/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
Bailout? Every dime taken from taxpayers to bailout a business is a dime NOT SPENT on other businesses. Those who lose "if we do not bailout <whatever company>" is only one half of the equation; the other half are the businesses who do not get the money that the citizenry would freely spend (today or in the future) as they wish to do so (on businesses who survive without any "bailouts" being needed). Why should those of use who work hard, scrimp and save to get ahead (that is.. NOT SPEND MONEY TODAY so our tomorrows can be more financially secure) have to do without a portion of our income (potential savings) to "bailout" those who are irresponsible? Here's a different "take" than what the "Big Three" networks will provide the citizen with:
http://mises.org/story/3202 Written by kpf
on 11/20/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE